Windows operating system hosts multitudes of programming languages. The most notable include Java, C, C++, COBOL, MySQL and PHP. These platforms can also run Linux. Programming languages are vital in software development. Many Open Source systems such as Ubuntu enable ardent fans to contribute to the development of software applications. Both windows and open source systems enable development of mono and multi-user platforms.
The following is a comparison of programming in both windows and the Spen Source systems:
Stability of the operating systems
It is a fact that windows platforms can become fickle. They are, thus, susceptible to constant malfunctions especially over time. Users developing service oriented architecture and web applications using languages like Java have additional security issues due to malfunctions and bugs as well as Microsoft pushing .Net instead of Java after their very public battle with Sun. Windows also suffers from malicious software applications and viruses. Windows has problems with the cryptographic functions and thus it can be insecure when developing mono web applications. On the other hand, Linux operating systems have an exponentially lower count of known viruses and instances of malware. Many software developers prefer using Open Source systems since they are less vulnerable to security beaches as compared to Windows. Both operating systems also have bug fixes and security enhancements available for download but Linux has a global development community contributing code while Microsoft has a limited number of employees with access to the kernel source.
Data libraries available
Software development requires large and well designed libraries for the codes developed. The entire point of service oriented architecture is re-use, not re-invention. Software libraries also reduces the burden of debugging helping to ensure data integrity. The Qt platform provides a large and robust source library for developers to use when creating cross platform applications. Qt is the library chose for all KDE (K Desktop environment) and is currently being used by Ubuntu for their Unity interface. Qt supports Windows, Linux, Mac, iPhone, Android, and soon RIMM platform development. There are many other libraries available. Microsoft pushes .Net, which only works on Windows, as their development library of choice. An Open Source, and not completely compatible version of C# and .Net is mono.
Portability of software programs
Software developers are currently trying to deploy to as many platforms as possible with a single set of source code. While they may have been happy selling only to a Windows market, that is a dwindling option in today's world and will probably be a platform which exists only in people's memories and niche hobbyist locations in the near future. Both Linux and Mac have been exploding in popularity so software developers, especially those developing service oriented architecture solutions must include at least those two platforms. Nobody can realistically choose a single platform tool set in this market. As a result, mono now has Qt wrappers making Qt available to C# programmers, thus extending their careers..
Execution and management of programs
Windows platforms require more hardware to run applications as compared to most Open Source systems. Windows Vista forced many companies and individuals to switch to Linux rather than endure an expensive computer hardware upgrade during a down economy. As a result, many companies switch their standard desktops from Windows to Linux with Open Source office and browser products. Service oriented architecture developers need to include more platforms than ever. Some corporations are even demanding people in the field be able to access corporate data silos from their smart phones. Such demands from corporate America are pushing all developers towards Qt if they wish to have a long and rewarding software development career. Few companies can afford to completely redevelop applications for each platform they must now support.